Is “The Handmaid’s Tale” a feminist story?


The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian novel that has recently been adapted into a television series on Hulu. It is the story of a religious society that has taken over after the fall of the United States Government. After society crumbles, the Republic of Gilead is in control.

The central point of the society is the role of women. The story is told from a handmaid, a woman who is forced into a life of reproductive activity. Due to various reasons, infertility has risen and a limited number of women are able to bear children. These women become handmaids.

While this is clear oppression of women, is the society misogynistic or indiscriminately tyrannical?

In the first episode of the television adaptation, there are three bodies seen hanging from a building. These three bodies are a gay man, abortion doctor, and a priest. In a misogynistic society, why would there be men who were prosecuted if the country is now targeting women?

One suggestion is that the hanging of an abortion doctor implies an attack on women’s rights. Frequently, the topic of abortion is turned into an argument about a woman’s body and her rights. While this neglects philosophical, moral, or scientific arguments in defense of the unborn child, the point is still made here.

At the same time, what about the gay man and the priest? Homosexuality is clearly a crime. Not only was there a man who was hung for being gay, later there is a woman who is hung for having a lesbian relationship. Those who engage in these acts are labeled as “gender traitors.”

It is clear that while women are oppressed under the Republic of Gilead, there is a greater statement about tyranny.

In modern America, the government has a lot of power available in case of an emergency. If martial law were to be declared, the Constitution would be suspended and the country would be at the mercy of the few. Will the top of a government hierarchy always be honorable and trustworthy?

The story shows a quick fall for the country. After an alleged attack on the United States, the response was martial law. The Constitution was suspended and then a range of laws were put into place, including the freezing of bank accounts. Government in real life already has a great deal of control over the banking industry over terrorist concerns.

Martial law is the absence of accountability and a lack of rights. History shows us that the suspension of constitutions never ends well.

Instead of attempting to look at a specific gender message in the story, people should look deeper to the statement being made about society. An attack, real or staged, can be used to enact authoritarian laws. After the United States was attacked on September 11th, 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act passed. This legislation was a sweeping power grab, despite obvious conflicts with the Constitution. Various moves over the following years would be made, all under the guise of combating the bad guys.

If the Republic of Gilead is truly a misogynistic society, which it is to a degree, it was made possible by tyranny enabled by a crisis. Many are too quick to offer blind consent to a government out of fear. It happened during World War II when the United States Government forced Japanese Americans into internment camps. War hysteria was used to suspend the due process rights of American citizens.

Have we learned anything as a society?

The Handmaid’s Tale is an intriguing story that speaks to the struggles of women. But more importantly, it speaks to the power of tyranny and the ascension of authoritarians during a crisis. This is more important, because the inequality against various groups was made possible by power gained through fear.

Chris Dixon is a liberty activist and writer from Maine. In addition to being Managing Editor for the Liberty Conservative, he also writes the Bangor Daily News blog "Undercover Porcupine" and for sports website Cleatgeeks.


  1. But it is not as if there were a free market, the remaining fertile women would be wooed and treated like queens by rich men wishing to have children.
    Oh wait. Because feminists hate the free market, a fertile woman shouldn’t be valued more so has to be portrayed as some kind of slave. There is no black market of men wanting to acquire them?
    Men want to marry a sterile career woman, but then acquire a sex slave for children? The former is too close to what we have now.
    Oh, and why not just bring in a lot of fertile poor women who would be delighted to get citizenship from south of the border?

Comments are closed.

Latest from Culture

Wakanda Forever!

Marvel’s Black Panther is smashing box office records left and right, due in no small part

Thanks for visiting our site! Stay in touch with us by subscribing to our newsletter. You will receive all of our latest updates, articles, endorsements, interviews, and videos direct to your inbox.